Sunday, May 29, 2011

inertia should not need sustenance

I really love driving and for the longest time I couldn't figure out why. It costs money and requires a particular level of focus that can, at times, be exhausting. And then it hit me, after almost three years of driving. I love the forward movement, the act of rapidly approaching a destination. It doesn't even matter if the whole process is an illusion (i.e. driving around for the sake of driving around). I just love doing something. I am not the type to willingly put off responsibility in favor of "relaxing." I do not spend vacations vacationing. I am, for better or for worse, thoroughly type A and red. Lately, though, it's been incredibly difficult to keep my productive inertia. My to-do list is even longer now than when I made it early last week; I've felt guilt both upon going to bed without everything done and upon waking up too late in the day. It's just bad.

On the up side, I think I have a solution for my lazy version of the sneaky hate spiral .

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Reeeeally? You're joking, right?

So the other night I was driving home, taking my favorite out of the way route, when I passed two fine establishments right off the highway. The first, Spry Funeral Home, I had to think about. I thought, Surely they knew what they were doing. Surely they know how strange this is. I don't know why anyone would dub a funeral home spry. It's probably a family name, but personally if I had that particular last name and I was trying to name my funeral home, I would change my name. Or ditch the family name-d funeral home idea altogether. The second business was a bail-bonding place that advertised a free t shirt with every bail. I can't figure out why I think this is hilarious.

On a completely different note, the word of the day today is vertiginous, which is an adjective meaning "causing dizziness." Awesome word.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Starbucks and Suities

As I am sure most of you know or have figured out, I am a coffee addict. Okay, so that's a bit of an understatement. I am not just an addict. I am the coffee addict that starts to shake and twitch if I go for even a few hours without my java. But it goes beyond that; you see, I used to work at Starbucks. And you can bet that  I use the super-barista powers I obtained during my three month Starbucks employment to my advantage. Occasionally I swoop in and help someone order (don't worry, I only talk to people I actually know).

This past year I lived in a suite-style dorm; each suite had four rooms, a commons room, and a bathroom. Bestie coined the term "suities" for the girls other than one's roomie living in one's suite. I loved all of my suite-mates (which is kind of epically miraculous since I typically don't like girls at all), but Hannah was definitely my favorite. She is quite possibly the most flabbergastingly hilarious person I have ever met. She also has a bit of an issue ordering at Starbucks. It's really quite amusing watching her stand in line, a look of confused exertion on her face, trying to figure out what she wants to order. Somewhere around midterm time during our first semester, I started helping her out.

Me: Okay, do you want coffee or tea?

Hannah: Coffee. Definitely coffee.

Hot or cold? And if cold, do you want it iced or blended?

Uhm...hot?

Chocolate or no?

Definitely chocolate. But I don't want just a plain mocha...

...and so on and so forth. It wasn't till the last month or so of this past semester that she found out I used to work at a Starbucks. She had a near-eureka moment when she found out. Anyways, a couple of days ago she messaged me on a very popular social networking website.

I NEED YOU

whaaaa?


I'm going to Starbucks and I don't know what to get :)

lol I'm totally at starbucks right now. coffee or tea?

Well here's the scenario. It's in the 80s, humid. I'm going to start reading the LAST harry potter book at Starbucks. From there, I'"m going to my school for a fair with animals and all that jazz.

Okay, you want something iced, with lots of caffeine. But sneaky caffeine. Do you want it super sweet?

OF COURSE.

I would get a venti iced white mocha with an extra shot of espresso and a shot of toffee nut. It will make you have not-[insert private school name] appropriate feelings for Starbucks and whoever makes your drink for you. 

bahaha why? 

Because it is orgasmic. like I don't even like white mocha but I LOVE this drink. It is the shiznit, the bombdiggity, the bee's knees...

I love Hannah and her quirkiness. 

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

hrumph

 I stumbled upon this article a couple of weeks ago and in light of my Hard Core Feminists vs. The Homebodies rant, I thought it might be both relevant and intriguing. Not to mention horrifying, but then again, when is the truth ever pleasant?

‘What a slut’

What that four-letter word really means and why you shouldn’t use it
Mercedes Mueller — The Fulcrum (University of Ottawa)

OTTAWA (CUP) — “And then we went back to my place and fucked,” the girl ahead of me in line at the coffee shop triumphantly declared, catching her friend up on the weekend’s events.
    “I can’t believe you did that,” responded the second girl, incredulously. “You’re such a slut!” Both girls erupted into laughter as they grabbed their coffees and walked away.
    What’s wrong with this conversation? For starters, the fact that most of you silently thought “nothing” in response to that question.
    The word “slut” is everywhere — be it on TV, scribbled across a bathroom stall or in our everyday conversations. Even the Canadian Oxford Dictionary has an entry for slut, yet the word has inconspicuously taken on a meaning greater than that which can be defined by a dictionary.
    First used in the 14th century to refer to “a dirty, untidy or slovenly woman,” the word slut has always been applied to women of low character, specifically those who exhibit questionable sexual behaviour — behaviour that doesn’t conform to society’s patriarchal expectations of a woman’s sexual conduct.
    But within our contemporary culture, where it’s increasingly acceptable for a woman’s sexual identity to exist outside of a marriage, what constitutes “questionable sexual behaviour” is unclear. Nonetheless, words like “slut” and “whore” are hurled at women, usually in an attempt to exert control over their actions.
You’re a woman and you’re open about your sexuality? Slut. You’re a woman who enjoys having sex — be it within the confines of a monogamous relationship or as a career choice? Whore. You’re a woman who has never had sex before, but just so happens to wear shirts that say you do, indeed, have breasts? Skank.
When we consider the endless scenarios that render a woman a slut these days, it becomes clear that this word is used solely to shame a woman for expressing herself sexually. There’s a notion that this act of slut-shaming — making a woman feel ashamed for being sexual or having one or more sexual partners — is a tool that can be used to compel a woman to alter her behaviour for the better.
    Call a woman a slut and perhaps she’ll feel ashamed enough to change her behaviour — behaviour that society believes leaves her vulnerable to things like unplanned pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases and sexual assault. It’s for her protection, right?
    Far from leaving her better off, slut-shaming can irreparably damage a woman’s self-perception. Being called a slut for exhibiting perfectly normal sexual behaviour can cause a woman to associate herself with the negative connotations intrinsic to that word: Dirty, easy and worthless. Maybe she’ll indulge these unfounded labels and take on multiple partners, or maybe she’ll shut herself down to all forms of sexual activity out of shame. She may become a target for others to take advantage of, feeling as though her right to consent is taken away by her reputation. Either way, it diminishes a woman’s ability to express her sexuality — and that’s not healthy.
    Slut-shaming has been used to make examples out of “bad” girls to their peers, sometimes ending with severe consequences. In 2009, a 13-year-old girl from in U.S. sexted a photo of her breasts to a boy she liked, which was intercepted and circulated around her school and a nearby high school. The girl was forced to endure endless taunting by her peers, routinely being called a “slut” and a “whore.”
   When school officials were informed of these events, their response wasn’t to talk to the girl about what had happened, or to discipline the offending classmates. They suspended her from school for a week, an action that sends the message to students that calling someone a slut for exhibiting “slutty behaviour” is okay — that, perhaps, slutty girls deserve to be punished by their peers.
   She hung herself less than a week after the suspension.
   Beyond damaging someone’s reputation and self-esteem on an individual level, slut-shaming shapes societal discourse on things like rape, abuse and sexual harassment. There is an inconspicuous but real conception in society and our legal systems that rape is more understandable under certain circumstances — circumstances that revolve around the identity of the victim.
   In 2007, a British man charged with the rape of a 10-year-old girl was given concurrent two-year and 18-month jail sentences, as opposed to life in prison. The judge felt he was faced with “a moral dilemma” in this “exceptional case” because the victim regularly wore make-up, strappy tops and jeans, making her appear at least 16 years old — as though somehow her provocative clothing trumped her right to consent — assuming a child is even capable of consent.
   Cases like the above aren’t isolated anomalies in our legal systems. Rape cases are thrown out on the basis of the victim’s appearance — how they dress, act and speak — while instances of sexual harassment in the workplace are overlooked because of the victim’s sexual history. Women are constantly written off by their peers as worthless, irrelevant and less capable at the simple utterance of that four-letter word.
   The word slut has become a catch-all phrase used to defame a woman — one that has lost its meaning in society, while simultaneously carrying dark implications with its use.
   Next time you want to call a woman a slut, think about what you actually mean to say. Does the fact that she’s open about her sexuality make her a slut, or is she just a liberal woman? Is the woman that fucked your boyfriend really a whore, or is your boyfriend simply a cheating asshole? Is that classmate wearing the low-cut top skanky, or is she just gutsy enough to wear something you could never pull off? It isn’t until we stop being so loose with our word choice that the problems associated with this powerful vocabulary will begin to dissipate.

why can't I wear pink while I slay the dragon?

My summer job has become a mashed-up schedule of babysitting gigs. One of these gigs is watching the incredibly precocious 3-year old of my old boss. This girl is awesome, quite possibly one of my favorite children EVER; she is also quite possibly more pop-cultured than I can ever hope to be. Anyways, today the two of us were watching The Princess Bride. If you haven't seen this movie, stop reading now and go watch it. Seriously. It's not only epic and amazing, but to have not seen this fantastic film is a crime of stupid-big proportions- a crime with proportions quite possibly larger than those created by the "Who's Harry Potter?" crime. ANYWAYS, she said at one point "I want to be rescued." in response to my explanation of why Wesley was following Vizzini, Inigo Montoya, Fizzik, and Buttercup. My immediate mental response was "Pssh, yeah kid, me too," and her little sentence kind of exploded my thought processes for the rest of the day. Every time I'd be thinking about something, her cute little face would dive bomb through the thought and I'd be back to pondering her not so cute little statement.

The way I see it, there exists a sort of spectrum of women and their roles:

I don't claim to be on either end (obviously). I can and (gasp) like to cook, I do laundry, I'm good with kids. I also call people out on "Women's Work" jokes, find sex jokes hi-larious, like comics, never tire of watching Fightclub  and Braveheart. I am comfortable just left of the middle. And I would still like a Morelli or Ranger to come along and sweep me off my feet. So what? This whole Knight in Shining Armor business is not necessarily a bad thing; it's just that bad things tend to arise from sitting around wearing pink and waiting for some boy to gallop by and slay the scary dragon. The biggest issue being the obvious inebriated state of anyone claiming to slay a frichen' dragon. Seriously though, I think it's a crying shame that any woman who obviously wants a strong man in her life is automatically labeled as being weak or- even worse- old fashioned. Ick. Of course there are some who live up to this stereotype; unfortunately, Buttercup doesn't really do anything at all in The Princess Bride except flounce around and whine and threaten to kill herself. But what's even more a crying shame is the other side of the spectrum; if a woman claims she's a feminist, the knee jerk reaction of most everyone is to start looking for a mustache. What type of sick hypocrisy is this? I love being able to vote and go to school and all that jazz, but there are definitely times when I wonder if they didn't have the right idea a couple hundred years ago; at least then they had a clearly defined system.And then there are the in-betweens, which as anyone who has studied population growth (with a bell-curve, of course) knows, is about 90% of the population. I don't really have much to say about us, mostly because there are just too many mixed signals and scenarios to choose from. BUT, from what I know about her parents, this little princess is doomed to be an in-between. I really hope she doesn't get hurt or disenchanted somewhere along the way of growing up.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

a new discovery leads to more...

so i was sitting in starbucks working and listening to one of my liked mixes on the most amazing idea since pandora and it switched and suddenly i was listening to new friends, old habits and the most beautiful little blurb was written out to the side...

Cause I could see your heart. You held it out before you for everyone to see, and I worried that it would be bruised or torn. And more than anything in my life I wanted to keep it safe, to warm it with my own.

what i would give for a man to say this to me.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Sex-Ed vs. Abstinence-Only Education (an old essay)

Films such as Juno, which tells the story of a teenage pregnancy resulting from boredom, reveal an alarming fact: teenage pregnancy in the United States has risen to one of the country’s most rampant problems. This issue stems from many factors, but lack of instruction in contraception and disease prevention is by far one of the most prominent causes. The flawed practice of instructing students by using abstinence-until-marriage-only curricula without safe-sex instruction as well results in horribly unprepared and uneducated teenagers. I believe that due to the extremely inconclusive nature of abstinence-only education, the federal government should not rely only upon such programs; rather, the government should utilize the comprehensive sex education curricula so as to avoid leaving teenagers ignorant of the consequences of sexual activity.

Sex education, commonly referred to as sex-ed, instructs teens about all things concerning sex, from puberty to dating advice; the program often includes abstinence as part of the curriculum but not as the fundamental basis of the entire program. On the other hand, abstinence-only or abstinence-until-marriage curricula fervently refuse to discuss any means of birth control other than abstaining from sexual activity until marriage. These curricula neglect to teach students about proper condom usage or other such fundamental topics, leaving the students without vital information. As a result, a breeding ground for transmission of disease through unprotected sex and teenage pregnancy outside of marriage has erupted amongst the nation’s youth, the future generations of our country. An even more disturbing fact –abstinence-only instruction is only banned from curricula in sixteen states. This translates to roughly one third of the country, even in the best of circumstances. The government does not send two thirds of our army into battle unarmed and unprepared; why should they send two thirds of us, the future, up against such enemies as AIDS and HPV without sufficient knowledge?

In contrast, sex education follows the age-old adage, “Always be prepared!” The program does so by informing teenagers about pregnancy, puberty, contraceptive use, and sexually transmitted diseases. Sex-ed does not waste time preaching to deaf ears about the “rising incidence of STDs, emotional and psychological injuries, and out of wedlock childbearing” that result from sexual activity.  Instead, sex education programs take necessary time to educate students on a vast array of topics, such as the numerous contraceptives available and their proper usage. Sex education programs prepare students for sexual activities and the possible resulting consequences while the abstinence-only programs merely scare students into ignoring their insistent, hormone-riddled, bodies.  The abstinence-only programs rarely allow students to receive information concerning birth control or condoms and merely instruct teens to wait until marriage to become sexually active.

In tenth grade, I enrolled in the standard health class. In this class, I did not learn much about why I should not have sex or how to protect myself were I to decide to become sexually active; instead, I learned just enough about STDs and contraceptives to suit the curriculum’s scare tactics. Though I cannot speak for my peers, I know from my own experience that scare tactics do not work. They leave me fearful, which in turn makes my reasoning and logic sloppy and inconclusive. Thankfully, I am not cursed with parents embarrassed about “The Talk,” so I have had enough instruction about sex and contraception and pregnancy to make clear decisions. But I know many teenagers do not have a reliable source of information concerning the topic. I see the girls five, six, eight months into pregnancy in the hallways, walking towards their next classes. Surely everyone has at some point. They embody the epidemic of teenage pregnancy alongside the much larger population of teenagers suffering from STDs such as Chlamydia, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, or even AIDS. These diseases as well as teenage pregnancy embody the true enemies of today’s youth. Young people, in many cases, remain utterly vulnerable because they do not have the one true useful weapon: knowledge. Knowledge of the consequences of sex –all of the consequences –is the most valuable defense any teenager has against pregnancy or disease. In making sex an uncomfortable subject –one for behind closed doors only after marriage –and in teaching ideals that force teens to ignore insistent impulses, the government has left us defenseless and unprepared against disease and pregnancy. I believe that in refusing us this one little favor, the government has done today’s youth a great injustice.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

A piece of writing that I absolutely love and wish I could lay claim to

The Writing Paradox: How Writing about Hurts Can Actually Heal

We were going to Hilton Head Island for vacation, and my mom said I had to have a bathing suit, even though I had refused to go swimming for years. When I tried on that bathing suit, something inside of me—something that was already fragile—snapped. I had never been comfortable with my body or myself, and as I entered my teenage years my self-consciousness heightened and my self esteem lowered. This is the night my journey into self hatred began to manifest itself in less subtle ways.

Before this night, much had happened in a short period of time, and I had no idea how to handle the emotions I felt: My friend Emile was sick and had furiously rejected my attempt to help her; my “adopted mom,” Michelle, had moved eight hours away; and I had begun to realize how dysfunctional my family was. I was devastated that Emile was angry with me and that she was hurting, I was lost without Michelle’s advice, and I was stripped of any illusion that my parents had a healthy relationship—or that I had a relationship at all with my dad.

After “the bathing suit incident,” Michelle encouraged me to write to her positive qualities about myself; it was over a thousand words of raw, fourteen year old angst and frustration about the fact that I couldn't seem to find any good qualities in myself. I emailed my venting to Michelle, who undoubtedly regretted having asked me to do this because I hadn’t written anything positive; and I felt better for having released all of those thoughts to someone other than myself. Without realizing it, Michelle had made me aware of this realm of ultimate diary-writing where I was able to empty all the toxic thoughts from my overstuffed brain—and do it quickly. While writing made me aware of the brokenness in my life and caused me a lot of pain, I realized I needed it. As Jamaica Kincaid wrote in My Brother, “I became a writer out of desperation” (qtd. in Zimmermann 13).

Beginning high school, my writing was oriented towards my struggles with anxiety, depression, and an eating disorder that had been building through the years; I was drowning in emotional stress and didn’t see any means of floating besides writing. I chose writing over sleeping, eating, and doing homework. Four years later, I’m still dealing with the struggles that became evident during my freshman year of high school, and I’m still writing. I write because I have to; if I didn't write, I would self-destruct—it’s simple as that. I continually learn through the act of putting my thoughts and experiences on paper that life is ugly and beautiful, that I am weak and strong—and that life is a bundle of paradoxes. I’m thankful I discovered writing when I did; I have a head start in dealing with my demons, and I’ve realized early on the place that writing has to have in my life in order for me to stay sane.

In A Long Way Gone, Ishmael Beah does exactly what I hope to do one day with my experiences: he creates an inspiring and emotionally charged memoir. Though Beah’s and my stories are almost as different as they can be (for example, I was never a child soldier in Sierra Leone), I saw myself over and over again in his descriptions of avoiding thinking as a coping mechanism. In Writing to Heal the Soul, Susan Zimmermann writes that she had “sidestepped [her] sorrow, not knowing how to move through it,” but that using writing to move through her pain had lead her into a place of healing (17). This was Ishmael Beah’s process. When he went to New York to meet other children facing similar situations as he had, Beah participated in long discussions about “solutions to the problems facing children in [their] various countries.” He says, “[it] seemed we were transforming our sufferings as we talked about ways to solve their causes and let them be known to the world” (Beah 148-149). That phrase, “transforming our sufferings,” seems to be an apt description of the effect writing our stories can have. Beah went through a major transformation from carefree, innocent child to murderous, robotic boy solider—and then to courageous, wise young man. I, too, have gone through a transformation: from carefree, innocent child, like Beah, to terrified and self-destructive teenager, to honest and determined young woman. In an interview with Jon Stewart on The Daily Show, Beah says that he wanted people to know through his book that “human beings are capable of true evil and equally capable of regaining [their] humanity.” He shares how he tried to write as he felt back then when he was twelve years old. Beah took himself back to the most traumatic experiences of his life, and described them in detail—and that is precisely why his memoir is so affective for his audience and for him. Beah had stumbled upon healing through writing. He recognizes that by writing, he “transformed [his] experiences into something positive.” He had shared with others what had happened to him—and to many other children across the world— in order to move on from those experiences into a new life, and also to make the world aware of what was going on in other countries to innocent children; Beah used his memoir to testify to the injustice committed against him, and so have I.

Shoshana Felman, in her book Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History, defines testifying as a “vow to tell, [a] promise [to] produce one’s own speech as material evidence for truth” (Felman and Laub 5). Using writing as testimony gives it a power that a simple diary entry doesn’t possess. The purpose of testimony is to deal in a public way with experiences in order to heal the person sharing as well as to teach the audience. In Writing as a Way of Healing: How Telling Our Stories Transforms Our Lives, Louise DeSalvo says:

Scores of other writers…write about what they have lived through—experiences that might not be commonly known—to heal themselves. But they also write to help heal a culture that, if it is to become moral, ethical, and spiritual, must recognize what these writers have observed, experienced, and witnessed. All are writing to right a human wrong—one that affected them, surely, but one that affects others, too. Writing testimony, to be sure, means that we tell our stories. But it also means that we no longer allow ourselves to be silenced or allow others to speak for our experience. (216)

Testifying to our experiences has a freeing effect on us as well as the people who hear the testimonies. Eyes and minds are opened as a result of the sharing, and the sharer feels more at peace with himself and his thoughts. DeSalvo believes that “[writing] to heal, then, and making that writing public…is the most important emotional, psychological, artistic, and political project of our time” (216). Therapists seem to agree with DeSalvo, because more and more frequently, they are encouraging their clients to tell their traumatic stories to several people, claiming that it would hasten the disappearance of symptoms like anxiety that are connected to their experiences (Felman and Laub 26). Every time I share my story with others, I feel less controlled by the self-deprecating thoughts that haunt me: I’m “diffusing [their] power over [me]” (DeSalvo 22).

Dr. James Pennebaker, in his book Opening Up: The Healing Power of Expressing Emotions, discusses at length the studies he performed on college students to prove that writing about traumatic experiences in a detailed and emotional way improves psychological and physical health. He found that students who wrote in this way consequently went to the on-campus clinic fifty percent fewer times than they did before the study. Pennebaker links this seeming increase in health to the decrease of inhibition that occurs when people write and/or talk about their experiences effectively. This inhibition Pennebaker writes about is when “people must consciously restrain, hold back, or in some exert effort to not think, feel, or behave,” (9) and this, according to Pennebaker’s studies, has deleterious effects on everyone who does it: inhibition is like stress in that it “gradually undermines the body’s defenses” (2).

Pennebaker discovered through his studies that people who didn’t talk about their “major life stressors” had “recurrent unwanted thoughts, higher levels of anxiety and depression, insomnia, and a variety of health problems” (25). In fact, not writing or talking about greatly traumatic experiences, or “not [translating] the event into language” is linked to “ruminations, dreams, and associated thought disturbances” as well as some psychological disorders like multiple personality disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (9). Writing and talking about these events is crucial in the healing process because “the mind torments itself by thinking about unresolved and confusing issues.” Writing is a preventative tool against this torment because it “promotes self-understanding” (93).

Pennebaker believes that sharing rather than inhibiting traumas is a “natural human response” that “can influence our basic values, our daily thinking patterns, and feelings about ourselves” (27, 2). In writing or talking about traumas, people free their minds to think about other things and simultaneously begin to understand what happened to them from a different perspective. Pennebaker also found that writing about these events allows for an “organization to the event and a summarizing of it” (97).

Sharing our experiences after writing them is important; because not sharing them, “…keeping [them] locked away where no one can read [them,] repeats the lethal pattern of silencing and tyranny and shame that so often accompanies trauma” (DeSalvo 209). If writing is to be a truly freeing tool, it shouldn’t be kept only to ourselves. Sharing helps us to remember that we are not alone in our struggles and pains. I have met several people who have been through similar situations as I have because I shared my experiences with them. People who have experienced horrible things often feel alienated from the people who haven’t; and in sharing their experiences, they enable others to understand what has happened, which eliminates the feeling of aloneness and may simultaneously provide the motivation someone else needs to share his story.

The Ethiopian perspective of illness is quite different from the American perspective of illness. DeSalvo focuses on how the people of Ethiopia see illnesses as opportunities for an “internal spiritual and healing journey” (181). John L. Coulehan says, “Illness and disability… entail our sustaining gigantic losses: of meaning, of wholeness, or certainty, of relationships, of freedom, of control” (qtd. in DeSalvo 181). This, of course, is true both for Ethiopian and American people; but the Ethiopians use their illnesses as a tool to learn instead of as a curse or as a nuisance slowing them down. Instead of their illness setting them apart from healthy people, it becomes a bond that brings sick and healthy people together. In The Wounded Storyteller, Arthur W. Frank writes that the “ill, and all those who suffer, can also be healers. Their injuries become the source of the potency of their stories” (xii).

It may be tempting to think that just writing at all will be a helpful experience, but Pennebaker’s studies demonstrate that only writing in a way that describes in detail an experience as well as the writer’s emotions towards that event is healing. Writing about “superficial” things such as the color of one’s shoes is not helpful in any way, and writing only about emotions towards events or only about the events themselves may actually be harmful because it leaves the writer in a mental place to focus on the event instead of work through it (37). DeSalvo says, “… only writing that describes traumatic events and our deepest thoughts and feelings about them, past and present, is linked with improved immune function, improved emotional and physical health, and behavioral changes indicating that we feel able to act on our own behalf” (25).

I’m not sure that I would be in college—or, at least not in college and doing well—if I had not discovered writing four years ago. I would not be able to understand why I struggle with the things I do or how to begin healing from them if I hadn’t poured myself on paper and began to see my challenges in a less insurmountable way. Through writing I have learned that I am a person worthy of love from others and myself, that I am capable of overcoming my struggles, and that I am strong.